Meira um námsmat

Upplýsingarvefur um einstaklingsmiðaða kennsluhætti

4Þetta tákn merkir að undir litaða textanum sem fylgir sé virkur tengill

Forsíða

 

 

 

 

Meira um námsmat

 

 

 

 
bullet 4Mælingar og mat á skólastarfi (Linn og Gronlund, þýðing Ólafs Proppé)
bullet4Ákvæði Aðalnámskrár grunnskóla (1999) um námsmat / Aðalnámskrá grunnskóla
bullet4Áhugavert veftímarit um námsmat:



 
bullet4Um námsmat - efni af emTech vefnum
bullet4FairTest
Vefur bandarískra samtaka sem berjast fyrir réttlátu námsmati. Á þessum vef er m.a. að finna lista yfir skýrslur og greinar um námsmatsaðferðir í anda Authentic Assessment stefnunnar:Documents and Articles on Authentic Assessment and Accountability
bullet4Um námsmat af vefnum: Pathways to School Improvement
bullet4ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation
bullet4Leiðbeiningar um námsmat af Houghton Mifflin vefnum
bulletBond, L. 1995.4Critical issue: Rethinking assessment and its role in supporting educational reform . Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Mathematics Teacher, 85, 16-21. Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. [ED381985]
bulletHaury, D. 1993.4Assessing student performance in science. ERIC CSMEE Digest. (ERIC NO.: ED359068)
bulletHirsch, J. 2001.4Mediated learning and dynamic assessment. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Thinking, Auckland, New Zealand, January
bulletHummel, J., & Huitt, W. 1994.4What you measure is what you get ... GaASCD Newsletter: The Reporter, 10-11
bulletKehoe, J. 1995.4Basic item analysis for multiple-choice tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 4(10)
bulletLeach, E. 1992.4An alternative form of evaluation that complies with NCTM's standards. Mathematics Teacher 85(8),  628-632.
bulletMacColl, Gail S.; White, Kathleen D. 1998.4Communicating educational research data to general, nonresearcher audiences. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. [ED422406]
bulletMack, P., & Delicio, G. 20004Assessing the use of information technology in the classroom. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 6(1)
bulletMcMillan, James H. 2000.4Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(8) 
bulletMeisels, Samuel J. 1997.4Using Work Sampling in Authentic Assessments. Educational Leadership (54(4)
bulletMoskal, B. (2000).4Scoring rubrics: What, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3).
bulletMoskal, B., & Leydens, J. 2000.4Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(10)
bulletPhelps, R. 1999.4Why testing experts hate testing. Fordham Report, 3(1). 
bulletRussell, M., og Haney, W. 2000.4Bridging the gap between testing and technology in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(19)
bulletSanders, W., og Horn, S. 1995.4Educational assessment reassessed: The usefulness of standardized and alternative measures of student achievement as indicators for the assessment of educational outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 3(6)
bulletTaylor, C. & Nolen, S. 1996.4What does the psychometrician's classroom look like? Reframing assessment concepts in the context of learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 4(17)
bulletTravis, Jon E. 1996.4Meaningful assessment. Clearing House, 69(5), 308-312

horizontal rule

Ingvar Sigurgeirsson 2003 - síðast breytt 27.12.2004